We need a Robin Hood Tax for renters

It's great that Labour is looking at cutting tax breaks for bad private sector landlords, but they should be targeting them all.

According to the government’s English Housing Survey 30% of England’s 4.4 million private rented sector homes failed to meet the decent homes standard. This is a scientific survey of over ten thousand homes that takes place each year.

We think Labour’s proposal to cut tax breaks for landlords whose properties are in poor condition is well-intentioned but raises a challenge. You can’t just implement this with a national register of landlords (which we support), you would also need to inspect the portfolio of every landlord claiming the tax break.

We think there are about 1,500 professional Environmental Health Officers working for councils in housing. If they all dropped all their enforcement work they would have to do 13 inspections a day to cover the whole PRS in a year.

We do support more enforcement of housing conditions and we also call for higher standards to be maintained so that there’s a level regulatory playing field between social sector and private sector housing. But the tax isn’t the way to do it. Landlords simply shouldn’t be allowed to earn money from forcing people to live in squalid conditions.

So Labour’s proposed register of landlords should have far tougher teeth than simply the removal of tax breaks.

But on tax, Labour has missed a major point. Why should any landlords get these tax breaks at all? By vaguely defining themselves as either businesses or individuals, landlords get to evade paying tax on mortgage interest and capital gains, they pay neither council tax nor business rates, many get a 10% “wear & tear” allowance, and HMRC estimates they’re still illegally avoiding another half a billion pounds on top of that. Plus they are receiving over £9 billion a year in housing benefit, often housing the most vulnerable people in poorest conditions.

We’re calling for a clawback of these landlord tax scams, which with housing benefit we think adds up to £27.7 billion a year. With a 22% tax on rent income you could raise £9 billion, and we think that should be hypothecated for building social housing.

And rents wouldn’t go up – because landlords are already getting the market rent out of tenants. Supply and demand is how rents are currently set, not landlord costs. And if some landlords left the market it wouldn’t matter, because they would sell those homes, meaning house prices would go down, due to the increase in sellers (see - supply and demand again).

More than that, building an extra 100,000 social homes each year with the money raised by the tax would also bring rents down, because you would reduce the number of tenants in the PRS (reducing demand). You’d also bring down the housing benefit bill because it’s much cheaper in social housing than it is at market rents.

The Green Party is proposing 500,000 council houses over the parliament paid for from cutting landlord tax breaks. It’s great that Labour now is also looking at this unjustified cash that just helps keep house prices high. But please support our call for a Robin Hood Tax for Renters as a real and effective solution to the housing crisis. https://www.change.org/p/uk-government-a-robin-hood-tax-for-renters

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2015-05-03 12:37:06 +0100
    It is very interesting that highly emotive words like “scam” are used in the article. The landlords are exercising their rights to allowances by claiming those that they are allowed to by law. If they meet the rules connected with an allowance, no scam involved.

    Taxation is a complex game played by the players in a democracy. If HMRC are not up to collecting the taxes they are supposed to, should they not be taken to account?

    Do social housing providers get subsidies? Do they pay council tax or business rates? What allowances are they allowed? Does the PRS get the same level of subsidy?

    In the public debates about tax avoidance and evasion, it was clearly set out that tax avoidance was legal and that tax evasion was illegal. In your article you talk about illegal avoidance. You appear to be getting confused or would confuse readers by your articles.

    We have provided good quality housing (that was inspected for quality by the council) to “vulnerable tenants” at “affordable rents” (wholly covered by their LHA benefit). The tenants may not always respect the property but choose to live in dirt and rubbish which they create themselves and are too lazy to clear up and put into the local authority waste system. When they are asked to clean up their act, they get offended and run to the council alleging harassment amongst other serious allegations. We use S21 and other notices to evict them. They leave a decent home trashed and it takes a lot of money to get back into a good lettable state. The council and tenant support charities are deafeningly silent about telling the tenants how to live decently and in a good “tenant like way”. That is not to say there are no bad landlords out there nor good tenants. We do have good tenants too.

    It is very interesting that you raise the point about supply and demand. The supply of land for building homes is not infinite. Planning permission is controlled by the government. BTL acts within the pool of available housing but the private sector could also help to contribute to a bigger pool of housing. Command economies (pure command) are known for inefficiencies, lack of innovation. I think getting the balance between command driven and demand driven is the difficult bit.
  • Generation Rent posted about We need a Robin Hood Tax for renters on Generation Rent's Facebook page 2015-04-25 22:36:10 +0100
    Labour to cut tax breaks for bad private landlords, but they should be targeting them all.
  • @genrentuk tweeted this page. 2015-04-25 22:36:06 +0100
    Labour to cut tax breaks for bad private landlords, but they should be targeting them all. http://www.generationrent.org/we_need_a_robin_hood_tax_for_renters?recruiter_id=3788