Getting the best from Newham's renewed landlord licensing scheme

This week those campaigning for a better private rented sector received an early Christmas present with the announcement that the Communities Secretary had approved the majority of Newham's proposal for a renewed borough-wide landlord licensing scheme.

You may remember that we blogged earlier in the year about concerns around the delay in getting a decision on the scheme, particularly when it had such widespread support and was demonstrably improving the private rented sector in the borough.

It seems the government have listened, although the scheme is no longer borough-wide, as the Olympic Park build-to-rent scheme in Stratford has been exempted.

While there may be no chance of beds in sheds in a development like this, tenants there are paying higher rents and like everyone, surely deserve the same level of protection. We also hope that it doesn't signal a move towards allowing institutional landlords to avoid the regulations that they don't like.

Now that the decision has been made, with 41,000 tenants (and counting) in Newham falling under licensing for the next five years, the hard work can really start.

Newham has led the country in cracking down on rogue landlords, and being proactive in prosecuting housing offenders, but there is still much to be done.

In particular, the council should be going into next year's local elections with proposals to make the scheme as tenant-friendly as possible, ensuring that renters are aware of their rights and are properly supported when their landlords fails to comply with conditions around upkeep and management.

We also hope this positive decision from central government will encourage more local authorities around the country, to consider borough-wide schemes, and London councillors should be pushing for this in their upcoming manifestos, in a city where more licensing is so clearly needed.

As a result of the delays in approving the scheme, Newham's private renters will now face a gap between the end of the old scheme and the start of the new, which should have been avoided.

However, today we should be welcoming an important acknowledgement of the effectiveness of licensing, and preparing to make the new scheme better and more successful than the last.

Showing 1 reaction

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2018-03-01 14:38:02 +0000
    This Christmas present is a dud.

    You say that licencing in Newham has demonstrably improved the PRS? What evidence do you have to support that claim? I would say it has been a disaster, has shown by Shelter figures which show that Newham now has the highest rate of people in temporary accommodation in the country. Why is that? Could it be that if you pile more and more regulation and cost onto landlords some of them will simply sell up.

    If you’re a private tenant in Newham, from March your landlord will be having to pay at least £750 per property in licence fees, for what? Like any business, your landlord will seek to pass on extra costs to its customers. That means you the tenant will be paying more thanks to licencing. How can that be a successful outcome for tenants?