GENERATION RENT campaigns for professionally managed, secure, decent and affordable private rented homes in sustainable communities.

Join us today and help campaign for a better deal for private renters.

How we help

  • hwh-1.pngCall for changes in legislation, strategies, policies and practices to make private housing a better place to live

  • hwh-2.pngStrengthen the voice of private tenants by developing a national network of private renters and local private renters’ groups
  • hwh-3.pngEncourage private renters to set up local groups in their own areas
  • hwh-4.pngWork with affiliates towards achieving the aims of Generation Rent
  • commented 2016-02-05 18:59:01 +0000
  • commented 2015-11-20 20:46:07 +0000
    32 the old school, the oval, stafford ST17 4US

    can hear everything next door does. neighbours also smoke weed. The landlord (cassandra smith) is extremally rude and arrogant and breaches contacts – informed me a week in advanced that I was to move out for no reason when the contract remained in date – she even tried to increase price of rent after I’d signed the contract. She also made a false claim on my deposit claiming 50 pounds for cleaning of the carpet when they were already clean.The landlord would never visit the property to complete any maintenance, and when maintenance was required she would refuse to do it or even pay for it.
    When landlord did visit would leave a mess for you to tidy after her, such as unwashed dishes, hair from her wig and rubbish that she hadn’t put in the bin.
    When I first moved in, the landlord had not cleared out the fridges and there was therefore out of date fish and meat that stunk the whole flat out. This was therefore a health and safety hazzard! Landlord had not cleaned the property when I moved in, which I therefore had to do – the majority of this was her hairs they were everywhere!
    Word of advice, do not rent off this woman, she is untrustworthy and unhelpful you will be better off renting from a reliable agency.
  • commented 2015-10-12 12:14:12 +0100
    James, sorry, one last point I forgot to add. You say that the situation is different in London. Irrespective of where I may be located, people who need to be in or near London should not be disadvantaged, as you do seem to accept. And BTL activity as I describe carried out elsewhere can do nothing but bring the “London” scenario to other areas, so eventually it will be country wide. and then where would FTBs be? Wider picture needs thinking about…..
  • commented 2015-10-12 11:08:55 +0100
    James M, just as you tell me I’ve made some fundamentally wrong assumptions concerning your personal lifestyle, I can assure you that your most recent post also has very much got the wrong end of several sticks about my situation. Let me just say that I absolutely agree with you about the financial choice FTBs have to make when deciding to purchase, and I agree indeed that far too many choose the iPhone/gym/flash car/too many visits to the nail salon etc. choices. But sensible ones don’t, they do save, have done for many years, and have a deposit which frankly exceeds the total purchase price of some properties in areas such as those examples you mention. They also have regular jobs earning above the reported national average wage for which they have studied for some years, never accumulated a student debt, paid their own way and done everything you would expect and more. Please believe me, I have done all the relevant research to back up my opinions as stated. It IS difficult to converse with strangers on emotive topics online, especially if, like me, you do not want to put any personal information out there. You have to trust your correspondents more than normal, which is why I took such exception to you effectively telling me I was lying with my example about the 17 BTLs v the 1 FTB. It’s quite true. I take your point about there “only” being 1 FTB interested, but that was on the first day of viewing, which happened to be a weekday when most FTBs would have been at work. So you could take the inference that only the BTLs were available on that day as they don’t have a “proper” 9 – 5 job, but are living off their property income. Additional FTBs did view the property in the evening and at the weekend, but it was sold to a BTL. I’ll also say that it’s impossible to generalise; there are always going to be BTLs with genuine motives who do try to help their tenants. You may be one, it’s impossible for me to tell. And there are regional variations in many factors. So, very tricky, as there will always be a counter argument. You have given some in this last post, but with respect, I still think you are hiding behind them, and not acknowledging my main, indeed only, point. If I want to buy your hypothetical fish and chips, I have a choice. I might choose a savaloy instead of fish, or just go for the bag of chips. Or indeed, only have bread and butter that night as I don’t have the cash available. But I HAVE to live somewhere, and if the only properties which I might be able to afford in the area I have to live in for work or family purposes are owned by BTLs, I’m forced to rent from them, or maybe stay at home with ageing parents well into my middle age, if they have a home of their own to offer me and the space to spare. This allows the BTLs to say they’re providing a vital function for me, whereas if I’d been able to outbid them, I’d have my own place. I assume you own your own house as well as those you rent out – isn’t it nice to know you do, or will one day, own it outright, then no-one can evict you, you can choose how to decorate and manage it without needing to consult the owner, you can leave a major asset to your kids…. I could go on and on about the advantages, but you must already know them. The vast majority of BTLs aren’t as “Good” as you make yourself to be (many examples all over the media), but you are ALL taking properties out of the market for fundamentally your own personal profit, albeit in the longer term, and denying that option to others at an earlier stage of their lives. If you choose to assuage your conscience by buying holiday homes for the disadvantaged, then that’s good, but it does highlight just how much profit you’re making to allow you to do so, and the cynical may choose to examine the tax break situation which this allows. I do accept some do choose to rent. If it’s their free choice, they will have presumably weighed the pros and cons before making it. If they are forced to rent, as in my example, it crushes the sprit out of them, and they wonder whether it’s all worth the effort. Constantly. This is why I think BTL for private individuals is wrong, immoral and should be banned. You gave an example earlier asking should profits from retail be banned. No, because I have a choice to shop there. If I owned your electricity, gas or water supply, there was no other option available to you, and I charged what I wanted, you’d be concerned, even if I charge a “fair” price. And if I could make a huge capital profit when I chose by selling it, would that be right? Of course not. So, thanks for your offer to meet up and justify things from your personal perspective, but it wouldn’t change things one jot. I’m not interested in how the figures may add up for you or any other individual BTL. I just feel the practice should not be allowed on moral grounds. I could go on, it’s an enormous topic, but I don’t think we’re going to convince each other.
  • commented 2015-10-12 09:12:47 +0100
    Hello again Foxwatcher. I’ve been trying to not get drawn into commenting on your posts but I’m so surprised by some of the things you’re saying I’m afraid I couldn’t resist any longer.

    It’s a shame you don’t acknowledge any of our points but continue to say that we’re some sort of evil wrongdoers when you’ve never actually met us and see what we do.

    So, our lettings businesses are just that. We run businesses and we take a profit from them, albeit small. I have responded before to your accusation that we drive expensive cars and I pointed out my van is old, indeed it has done over 132,000 miles. My wife’s car is not far behind that mileage so you see our little profit does not afford us the lifestyle you claim we have. Similarly, we have had no break at all this year but we hope to have 4 nights away in the UK in half-term, so no foreign holidays.

    Tell me, if I had a fish and chip shop, which of course provides an essential service of food, would you be OK if I made a profit on my sales? I’m guessing you would otherwise the business would collapse. And if I sold the business would you allow me a profit on it if I could make one? I’m guessing you would so why is it different for us, if indeed we manage to make a profit on a property sale.

    And for the umpteenth time I will offer to meet with you and show you the numbers but you have never even shown an interest and instead accused me of falsifying them without sight of them.

    Instead you continue to bang on about how we’re cheating FTB’s out of houses, yet in the one example you’ve offered of a house for sale you say only one FTB was after the house. Here’s a challenge for you, let’s meet I’ll show you the numbers, you supply me with the address and I’ll do some digging into who actually bought it, etc, and we can examine why your FTB wasn’t successful. Does that sound like a good deal?

    Now I absolutely need to correct you on landlords forcing up prices and forcing FTB’s out. Firstly price is influenced by supply and demand, that is for sure, but the real driver behind price is the availability of credit. When we had the recession, or credit crunch, prices dropped like a stone. Indeed in my area, a 3 bed terraced house went from about £110k to under £70k. I saw some around £65k, yet there wasn’t a queue of FTB’s out of the estate agents doors. Why?? Because they couldn’t get a mortgage. Actually very few people could get a mortgage hence the prices dropped to where they did. Now interest rates have been rock bottom for years and credit is easy to get, for most, not the FTB I’m afraid. This is largely due to the mortgage market review which has meant that finances are heavily scrutinised. If you have mobile phone contracts, gym membership, or any other monthly regular outgoings it counts against you!! Landlords didn’t come up with these rules, the financial services industry did and how do you think it affects youngsters that have to join David Lloyd, Virgin Active or One Leisure? And of course they simply have to have an Iphone 6 with unlimited download and so forth.

    I would even go so far as to say that landlords actually help to keep the price of starter homes down because of the enormous number of HMO’s (Houses in Multiple Occupancy) that we own across the country. Imagine if they were all shut down overnight and all those tenants started looking to buy a one or two bed house or flat. Do you take my point there? A starter home might house one or two people whereas an HMO could house 3, 4, 5, 6, 10 or more people.

    Never fear though FW. Some top economists around the world predict a correction in house prices within the next two years, and particularly in London, which is the most over-priced city in the Western world. This will knock on to areas outside the capital and if FTB’s take action now then they may (and I do mean ‘may’) be in a position to take advantage. If I was talking to a FTB now I would suggest that they save like they’ve never saved before. Cancel the gym, downgrade the phone and cut outgoings to a bare minimum. If prices drop by 30% again then they need to be able to act at a time when it will likely be difficult to get a mortgage again. Will the average FTB do it??? I doubt it very much. They prefer to whine and moan that landlords are evil wrongdoers cheating them out of their right of home ownership.
  • commented 2015-10-09 18:15:01 +0100
    Well I don’t donate the profits to charity because as from now I will have to donate both profits, losses and my day job to the government. But I suppose keeping my rents at 25% below market value for 10 years is a form of kindly donation to the tenants. And yes, very much part of the reason I do this is because I enjoy helping people back on their feet. Although I’m sure you donate far more time and money than me to good causes. Did I ever tell you about the time I funded the purchase of a holiday cottage in Derbyshire just so a local group for mentally handicapped children could have free holidays in perpetuity…?

Have something to voice?

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.


The Other Waitrose Effect - the hidden costs of gentrification

Is a new Waitrose in your neighbourhood a cause for excitement, or a troubling omen for your future in the area? 

A new study reveals that the high-end supermarket is linked with rising evictions of private tenants in areas they open up in.

The analysis, conducted by Oxford University academic David Adler for Generation Rent, found that the arrival of a new store was associated with an increase in the number of evictions of between 25% and 50%.


Great cheese selection, but will you be around to enjoy it?

Read more

Giving people the right to a safe home

This week saw the introduction of Karen Buck MP's Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation and Liability for Housing Standards) Bill, a private member's bill which will now have its second reading in parliament on Friday 19 January 2018.

The bill seeks to update the law requiring rented homes to be presented and maintained in a state fit for human habitation - updated because the current law only requires this of homes with a rent of up to £80 per year in London, and £52 elsewhere!

Read more

National study finds tenants optimistic but rental market oppressive

Every year the government runs the English Housing Survey. General findings are published in February, then, to the delight of housing geeks, the juicy detail on the different subsections of the market arrives in July. We've taken a look at the findings for 2015-16, published last week.

Read more

Queen's Speech 2017: are you listening Westminster?

Before today's Queen's Speech, which set out the government's parliamentary programme for the next two years, there were two theories about how housing and private renting might feature, and what kind of prominence it would be given.

Read more

If London housebuilding is reliant on overseas investment, where do we go from here?

Commissioned in Autumn 2016, the final report of the London Mayor’s investigation into the role of overseas investment in housing was published last week – but its findings can be read in very different ways.

Based on research by the LSE, its major conclusion and argument is that off-plan and pre-sales to the overseas market are integral to the current development model in London – and therefore also key to leveraging more affordable housing through section 106 agreements on those sites. 

Read more

Renters vote - and cause another political upset

The results are in, and the UK's voters have delivered yet another shock.

The dust still has to settle but one thing is already apparent: the votes of renters had an impact yesterday. Twenty of the 32 seats that the Conservatives lost to Labour and the Liberal Democrats had more renters than average. Back at the 2011 census, those 32 seats had an average private renter population of 19% - it was 16% in the country as a whole.

Read more

The choice tomorrow

We haven't been posting much on here for the past few weeks as we have joined forces with ACORN on #RentersVote for the duration of the election. 

There we have analysed each of the 5 UK-wide parties' manifestos and pulled it all together into one big graphic, so you can see what we made of their housing commitments side-by-side.


Read more

Save £404 when you move after fees ban

Tomorrow is the final chance to respond to the government's consultation on their proposals to ban letting fees.

Ahead of this we have published our latest research from, which features in today's Times (£), Guardian and i. We have also published an update to last year's report.

Our main findings are that the government's proposals will save the average tenants £404 when they move, and an average £117 every 6 or 12 months to renew the tenancy.

Read more

3.4m private renters risk losing their vote

With one week until voter registration closes, we've estimated that more than three million private renters in England are at risk of losing their vote at the General Election.

1.8m private renters have moved home since the 2016 Referendum and must therefore register again. Private renters are typically on tenancy agreements of no longer than 12 months and are six times more likely to move in a given year than homeowners.

Read more

Celebrating ingenuity in the property industry

The steam train. The vaccine. The television. The World Wide Web. The tenancy renewal fee.

What connects them all? Each one is an incredibly successful British invention.

Yes, we may no longer have the manufacturing prowess that once sustained all corners of the country, but a certain group of entrepreneurs have exerted their creative minds to produce the £250 photocopy, and are currently raking it in.

Read more